İptal davası ve itiraz yolunda Anayasa Mahkemesi`nin yaptığı ilk inceleme
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 37317
- Danışmanlar: PROF.DR. CEM ERTUĞRUL
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Kamu Yönetimi, Siyasal Bilimler, Public Administration, Political Science
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Anayasa 1961, Anayasa 1982, Anayasa Mahkemesi, İptal davası, İtiraz, Constitution 1961, Constitution 1982, Constitutional Court, Annulment action, Objection
- Yıl: 1994
- Dil: Türkçe
- Üniversite: Ankara Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
-147- VH- ÖZET (ÎNGÎLİZCE) This thesis dwells on discussions over a legal aspect of the Constitutional Court of the Turkish Republic. The Constitutional Court examines the legislative acts in two steps, namely, the preliminary or admissibility review on the one hand, and the substantital review, on the other. This study aims to examine the problems pertaining to the former review referred to above. However, this research is restricted the issues, emanating both from abstract norm control and concrete norm control. If the action for annulment is abstracted from any particular case, and if the constitutional validity of an legislative act of the parliament may be challenged directly before the Constitutional Court, this kind of appeal is called an abstract norm control. In contrast to annulment actions, described above, if a court, trying a case, finds that the law to be applied is unconstitutional, or if it is convinced of the seriousness of a claim of unconstitutionality, the court consults the Constitutional Court as to the agreement of the said to the constitution itself. In scientific literature, this kind of review is described as the concrete norm control. The“Introduction”of this study takes up, under the light of the Constitutions of 1961 and 1982, the history of constitutional jurisdiction, organisation, composition and competence of the Constitutional Court. The common problems of concrete norm control and abstract norm control in the preliminary review are examined in the“First Chapter”. The“Second Chapter”is devoted to an evaluation of the procedure of appeal and the eligibility of appealing to the Constitutional Court through implementing abstract norm control.-148- The“Third Chapter”explains the procedure of appeal to the Constitutional Court by the use of concrete norm control and also enumerates the conditions allowing a court appeal to the Constitutional Court. In the“Conclusion”, the main subjects dwelled on in the study I summarised. *fiöS&*
Benzer Tezler
- İcra inkar tazminatı
Execution denial indemnity
EGEMEN KÖYLÜOĞLU
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
1999
HukukAnkara ÜniversitesiÖzel Hukuk (medeni Usul ve İcra İflas Hukuku) Ana Bilim Dalı
YRD. DOÇ. DR. HALUK KONURALP
- Belediyenin imar planını yapması-değiştirmesi ve iptal davası
Başlık çevirisi yok
OĞUZ SANCAKDAR
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
1993
HukukDokuz Eylül ÜniversitesiKamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. DURMUŞ TEZCAN
- Türkiye`de kamu iktisadi teşebbüslerinin özelleştirilmesi ve iptal davası bakımından yargı denetimine tabi olması
Başlık çevirisi yok
MUHLİS ÖĞÜTÇÜ