Geri Dön

Mütareke ve Milli Mücadele (1918-1922) Dönemi edebiyat dergilerinde edebi eleştiri

Literary criticism in the literary magazines during the truce and National Salvation War, 1918-1922

  1. Tez No: 94261
  2. Yazar: ALİM KAHRAMAN
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF. DR. SUAT GEZGİN
  4. Tez Türü: Doktora
  5. Konular: Gazetecilik, Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı, Journalism, Turkish Language and Literature
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Dergiler, Edebi eleştiri, Edebiyat dergisi, Eleştiri, Milli Mücadele Dönemi, Magazines, Literary criticism, Literature magazine, Criticism, National Struggle Period
  7. Yıl: 2000
  8. Dil: Türkçe
  9. Üniversite: İstanbul Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Gazetecilik Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

364 ABSTRACT This dissertation analyzes literary critism during the priod of truce after the World War I and the national salvation war between 1918 and 1922. For this purpose, twenty three literary magazines were surveyed which had been published during this period mosty in Istanbul but also in such Anatolian cities as Ankara, İzmir, Bursa, Diyarbakır and Samsun. Their titles are Servet-i Fünûn, Edebiyât-ı Umûmiye, Temâşâ, Şair, Utarid, Şair Nedim, Edebî Mecmua, Büyük Mecmua, Gün Doğuşu, Lale, Zülal, Yeni Dünya, Süha, Genç Kalemler, Kaplan, Ümit, Genç Yolcular, Şebab, Anadolu Duygusu, Dergah, Bozkurt, Yarın, Küçük Mecmua, Yıldız. These magazines include around two hundred articles which can be classified as literary criticism. These articles are transcribed to latin alphabet before they are categorizied into three major groups: theoretical criticism, internal and external problems of literature, and critism of particular works. These categories are further divided into subcategories. The emphasis was given to the articles on theoretical criticism and the internal and external problems of literature while criticism of particular works which are also related with theoretical quetions raised in the period under investiqation. At the outset, the function of the newspaper, the relationship between literary critism and periodical literature and newspapers, development and general features of literary criticism after the First World War are briefly discussed. Next came the analyses of selected articles individually. Each article is analyzed in paragraphs. First, the original text is given; second, the rephrasing of the text in contemporary language is provided; third, the content is analyzed. At the end of each article, there is a section about the evaluation of the article in its entirety. This section, which is the main body of the study, is followed by a“General Evaluation”of all the artides analyzed. The analyses showed that extra-ordinary conditions of the period, psychology of war, and social defoliation negatively influenced the literature of the period. Particularly, in the beginning, the field of literature looked like 'a house without an owner" on which outside forces competed to dominate. Fragmentation, useless conflicts, unhealthy enviroment of criticism, emergence of political and ideological factors were among the issues the authors of the period complained. They also discussed such issues as war and literature, Turkish nationalism and national literature, purification of language, syllable and aruz meters. The lack of original works in the new Turkish literature, and in365 connection with this, artificial literature, and adaptationism in literature stood out among the internal problems of literature which are discussed in that period. The issue of translation from Western languages is also discussed within the context of search for orijinality and a new identity. 'Modern literature' is another issue that was discussed. Around Epope, there was a discussion around National Literature, modern literature and original work. From these perspetives, Binnaz and Çalıkuşu, two novels published in the period, were criticized. The periodical magazines of the period served as the basic vehicles in the expression of different views and criticsm despite the difficult conditions of the time. In this period, since a democratic mentality and environment that promote respect to the 'other had not developed, literary criticism was friquently used for offensive purposes.

Benzer Tezler

  1. İşgal dönemimde İstanbul basını (1918-1922)

    The Press of İstanbul at the period of occupation (1918-1922)

    SALİH TUNÇ

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1999

    Gazetecilikİstanbul Üniversitesi

    Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılap Tarihi Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ALİ İHSAN GENCER

  2. Mütareke'den Cumhuriyet'e (30 Ekim 1918 - 29 Ekim 1923) azınlıklarınsosyal, ekonomik, demografik yapısı ve dış ülkelerle olan ilişkileri

    From Armistice to the foundation of Republic (from October 30 th, 1918 - to October 29 th, 1923) social, economic and demographic structure of minorities and their relations with foreign states

    İBRAHİM MERAL

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1998

    Türk İnkılap TarihiHacettepe Üniversitesi

    Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılap Tarihi Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ABDÜLHALUK ÇAY

  3. Milli Mücadele romanında iç cephe

    The Interior front in the novels of Milli Mücadele

    ESAT CAN

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1998

    Türk Dili ve EdebiyatıTrakya Üniversitesi

    Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. BİROL EMİL

  4. Milli Mücadele Döneminde Halide Edip Adıvar

    Halide Edip Adıvar during the national struggle

    H.MURAT ARABACI

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1996

    Türk İnkılap TarihiHacettepe Üniversitesi

    Y.DOÇ.DR. ADİL DAĞISTAN

  5. Türk Edebiyatı'nda hece-aruz münakaşaları

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    HASAN KOLCU

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1989

    Türk Dili ve Edebiyatıİstanbul Üniversitesi

    PROF. DR. ÖMER FARUK AKÜN