Geri Dön

Sınıf II, divizyon 1 vakaların tedavisinde kullanılan Twin-Blok ve Andersen apareylerinin iskeletsel ve dentoalveolar yapılar üzerindeki etkilerinin karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi

A Comparison of effects of Twin-Block and Andresen appliances on skeletal and dentoalveolar structures in the treatment of class II, division 1 cases

  1. Tez No: 49125
  2. Yazar: NAZLI TÜMER (BÖKEER)
  3. Danışmanlar: DOÇ.DR. ALİ Ş. GÜLTAN
  4. Tez Türü: Doktora
  5. Konular: Diş Hekimliği, Dentistry
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Maloklüzyon-angle sınıf II, Tıbbi araç-gereç ve donanımlar, Malocclusion-angle class II, Equipment and supplies
  7. Yıl: 1996
  8. Dil: Türkçe
  9. Üniversite: Gazi Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.

Özet

103 SUMMARY This research was performed to compare the effects of Andresen and twin-block appliances on skeletal and dentoalveolar structures in the early treatment period of class II, division 1 malocclusions. Patients having skeletal and dental class II, division 1 malocclusions were selected and two treatment groups with a total of 26 patients and one control group with 13 patients were constructed. Lateral cephalograms and hand-wrist radiographs of these patients were taken before and after treatment, which formed the material of this research. The average chronological ages were 1 1 years 1 1 months for the first treatment group (monoblock), 1 1 years 6 months for the second treatment group (twin- block) and 1 1 years 9 months for the control group. An Andresen appliance was applied to each of the patients in the first treatment group where as, a twin-block appliance was applied to the each member of the second treatment group. The patients were instructed to wear the monoblock for 16 hours/day where as, patients in the second treatment group were instructed to wear the twin-block for 24 hours/day. Patients of the control group were followed for 12-20 months104 without any intervention. The treatment time for the first group was between 3 and 13 months and for the second group between 3 and 7 months. 37 different parameters were evaluated on the lateral cephalograms. Statistical analysis were made to determine the differences which occurred during the research period. The following results were observed by using these different functional appliances; the correction of sagittal jaw discrepancies and the stimulation of the growth of the lower jaw were obtained; particularly, in the twin-block group the SNA and Co-ANS values decreased, mandibular plane angle and gonial angle increased, a decrease in the degree of over-bite. Where as, in the monoblock group, effective mandibular length increased, within both groups the facial convexity and over-jet decreased, a distal movement of the upper molars and the mesialisation of the lower molars were observed. In the monoblock group upper incisors demonstrated a greater degree of retrusion and the inter incisor angle increased, however within the twin-block group the lower incisors showed a greater degree of protrusion.

Özet (Çeviri)

103 SUMMARY This research was performed to compare the effects of Andresen and twin-block appliances on skeletal and dentoalveolar structures in the early treatment period of class II, division 1 malocclusions. Patients having skeletal and dental class II, division 1 malocclusions were selected and two treatment groups with a total of 26 patients and one control group with 13 patients were constructed. Lateral cephalograms and hand-wrist radiographs of these patients were taken before and after treatment, which formed the material of this research. The average chronological ages were 1 1 years 1 1 months for the first treatment group (monoblock), 1 1 years 6 months for the second treatment group (twin- block) and 1 1 years 9 months for the control group. An Andresen appliance was applied to each of the patients in the first treatment group where as, a twin-block appliance was applied to the each member of the second treatment group. The patients were instructed to wear the monoblock for 16 hours/day where as, patients in the second treatment group were instructed to wear the twin-block for 24 hours/day. Patients of the control group were followed for 12-20 months104 without any intervention. The treatment time for the first group was between 3 and 13 months and for the second group between 3 and 7 months. 37 different parameters were evaluated on the lateral cephalograms. Statistical analysis were made to determine the differences which occurred during the research period. The following results were observed by using these different functional appliances; the correction of sagittal jaw discrepancies and the stimulation of the growth of the lower jaw were obtained; particularly, in the twin-block group the SNA and Co-ANS values decreased, mandibular plane angle and gonial angle increased, a decrease in the degree of over-bite. Where as, in the monoblock group, effective mandibular length increased, within both groups the facial convexity and over-jet decreased, a distal movement of the upper molars and the mesialisation of the lower molars were observed. In the monoblock group upper incisors demonstrated a greater degree of retrusion and the inter incisor angle increased, however within the twin-block group the lower incisors showed a greater degree of protrusion.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Aktivatörle tedavi edilen klas II, divizyon 1 vakaların pekiştirme sonrası dönemde değerlendirilmesi

    The Post retention evaluation of class II, division 1 treated with activator therapy

    BANU ERDOĞAN

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1996

    Diş HekimliğiAnkara Üniversitesi

    PROF.DR. MİRZEN ARAT

  2. Klas II, divizyon 1 malokluzyona sahip vakaların edgewise, begg ve aktivatör ile tedavileri sonucunda oluşan yumuşak doku değişikliklerinin incelenmesi

    The Evalution of soft tissue changes with edgewise begg and activator treatment in class II, division 1 malocclusions

    M. DENİZ BUZKURT

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1998

    Diş HekimliğiAnkara Üniversitesi

    Ortodonti Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. HAKAN GÖGEN

  3. Aktivatör ve Edge wise teknikleri ile tedavi edilmiş sınıf II/1 maloklüzyonlu bireylerin tedavi öncesi ve sonrası elektromyografik ve sefalometrik incelenmesi

    The electromyographic and cephalometric investigation of class II division 1 malocclusion treated with activatorand edge wise techniques before and after treatment

    BARÇIN ERÖZ

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1998

    Diş HekimliğiAtatürk Üniversitesi

    Ortodonti Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. MUZAFFER GÜLYURT

  4. Sınıf 2 divizyon 1 anomalisinde bionator apareyi kullanılmasıyla dil ve hyoid kemiğinde meydana gelen değişiklikler

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    MEHMET GÖKHAN ÖNÇAĞ

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1994

    Diş HekimliğiEge Üniversitesi

    Ortodonti Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF.DR. RÜŞTİYE SÜRÜCÜ