Geri Dön

Development of a comprehensive decision making framework for power projects in New South Wales (NSW)

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

PDF İndir

  1. Tez No: 401984
  2. Yazar: AYŞE TOPAL
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF. DEEPAK SHARMA
  4. Tez Türü: Doktora
  5. Konular: Enerji, Energy
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2014
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Unıversıty Of Sydney
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

In the backdrop of emerging concerns about sustainability, the contribution of electricity generation to sustainability, the complexity of power projects, and the narrowness of existing decision approaches for selecting power projects – this research develops a comprehensive decision-making framework that can be applied to select power projects for meeting future electricity needs in NSW. This framework is based on Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis (Analytical Hierarchy Process). This framework will assist with complex decisions regarding projects typified by multiple objectives, multiple decision makers, multiple attributes, conflicts, and socio-economic concerns. The appropriateness of this framework is established in this research in terms of its ability to assist with project choices (from among several alternatives), to meet medium (2035) and long term (2050) electricity needs of NSW, in a sustainable manner. The backdrop for the application of this approach is provided by five scenarios, representing alternative technological pathways, energy & environmental and socio-political settings. Fourteen attributes, reflecting major areas of concern relating to economic, environmental, technical, and socio-political issues are considered, guided by literature review and expert opinion. The overall ranking for each alternative is developed on the basis of, first, assessing the economic, environmental, and social impacts of the alternatives; second, incorporating decision makers' (expert) preferences for selected attributes, through a pair-wise comparison of various attributes; next, developing a weighted average across all attributes. These individual scenario rankings are then used to compare alternatives represented by various scenarios. The analysis suggest that, overall, the BAU scenario, representing a continuation of existing trends in generation-mix is likely to be the most detrimental scenario for achieving sustainable outcomes in NSW, as it will result in highest levels of levelized cost, GHG emissions, total waste, air pollution, visual impact, water use,resource (fuel) use, severe accidents; and lowest levels of new jobs, and political and social acceptance. The best option in the medium term (2035) for NSW will be the HR-1 scenario (40% share of renewables, with nuclear), as it will result in the highest levels of new jobs, political and social acceptance; and lowest levels of levelized cost, GHG emissions, total waste, air pollution, resource (fuel) use. The best option in the long term (2050) for NSW will be the HR-2 scenario (80% share of renewables, without nuclear), as it will result in the highest levels of new jobs, political and social acceptance; lowest levels of total waste, water use, severe accidents; and moderate levels of levelized cost, air pollution, water and resource use. It is interesting to note the change of preference from HR-1 scenario in the medium term, to HR-2 scenario in the long term, as informed by trade-offs between various attributes. The above insights clearly demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed framework for making complex decisions about power projects.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Tez No

    888530

    Development of operation and maintenance strategies for offshore wind industry based on big data management

    Büyük veri yönetimi ile açık deniz rüzgar endüstrisinde işletme ve bakım stratejilerinin geliştirilmesi

    UWE LUETZEN

    Doktora

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2024

    Enerjiİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Gemi ve Deniz Teknolojisi Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. SERDAR BEJİ

  2. Tez No

    421065

    A methodology for energy optimization of buildings considering simultaneously building envelope HVAC and renewable system parameters

    Binalarda yapı kabuğu, mekanik sistemler ve yenilenebilir enerji sistemleri parametrelerinin eş zamanlı enerji optimizasyonu için bir yöntem

    MELTEM BAYRAKTAR

    Doktora

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2015

    Mimarlıkİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Mimarlık Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. AYŞE ZERRİN YILMAZ

    PROF. DR. MARCO PERINO

  3. Tez No

    336464

    Çevre etiği çerçevesinde biyopolitikaların oluşturulmasında katılımcılık

    The importance of public participation in the process of policy making within the framework of environmental biopolitics

    ARZU İRGE ÖZYOL

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2013

    Siyasal BilimlerAnkara Üniversitesi

    Sosyal Çevre Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı (disiplinlerarası)

    PROF. DR. NESRİN ÇOBANOĞLU

  4. Tez No

    152178

    Evaluation of urban conservation and revitalization policy and practise in Europe and Turkey a case study on Ayvansaray in historical peninsula

    Avrupa ve Türkiye`de kentsel koruma ve revitalizasyon politikası ve uygulamaları üzerine bir değerlendirme İstanbul tarihi yarımada-Ayvansaray örneği

    ZEYNEP GÜNAY

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2004

    Şehircilik ve Bölge Planlamaİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    PROF. DR. NURAN ZEREN GÜLERSOY

  5. Tez No

    648187

    Privatization, liberalization and deregulation of Turkish state railways and frameworks for public-private partnerships

    Türkiye devlet demiryollarının kamu-özel işbirliği kapsamında özelleştirilmesi ve serbestleşmesi

    SHAHIN SHAKIBAEI

    Doktora

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2020

    Ulaşımİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    İnşaat Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. PELİN ALPKÖKİN

Geri Dön