Türkiye astrojeodezik ve astrogravimetrik jeoidinin belirlenmesi
Study on the determination of the Turkish astrogeodetic and astrogravimetric geoid
- Tez No: 39330
- Danışmanlar: PROF.DR. AHMET AKSOY
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Jeodezi ve Fotogrametri, Geodesy and Photogrammetry
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Astrogravimetri, Astrojeodezi, Jeoid, Astrogravimetry, Astrogeodetic, Geoid
- Yıl: 1993
- Dil: Türkçe
- Üniversite: İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.
Özet
ÖZET Yer gravite alanının deniz yüzeyi ile çakışan eşpotan siy elli yüzeyine jeoid adı verilir. Jeodezinin ana hedeflerinden birisi jeoidi, jeodezik hesapların yapıldığı bir referans elipsoidine göre belirlemektedir. Jeoid belirlemenin esası, üzerinde jeodezik hesapların yapıldığı referans elipsoidi ile jeoid arasındaki uzaklıkların (jeoid yüksekliklerinin) bulunmasıdır. Jeoid yüksekliklerinin belirlenmesi için değişik yöntemler vardır ve bu yöntemler çoğunlukla kullandıkları ölçülerin adlan ile anılırlar. Bu çalışmada astrojeodezik çekül sapmaları ve gravimetrik çekül sapmaları ile gravimetrik jeoid yüksekliklerinin ölçü olarak kullanıldığı astrojeodezik ve astrogravimetrik jeoid belirleme çalışması yapılmıştır. Bu çalışmada, astrojeodezik ve astrogravimetrik jeoid belirlemesinde değişik data gruplarıyla jeoid belirlenmiştir. Astrojeodezik yöntemde astrojeodezik çekül sapmalarından, astrogravimetrik yöntemde ise astrojeodezik çekül sapmalarının yanında gravimetrik çekül sapmalanda kullanılmıştır. Astrojeodezik çekül sapmaları Astronomik enlem ve boylam ile Avrupa 1950 datumundaki (ED-50) jeodezik enlem boylam değerlerinin karşılaştınlmasıyla elde edilmiştir. Gravimetrik çekül sapmaları ise Ag gravite anomalileri, yerpotansiyel katsayıları ve sayısal arazi modeli yardımıyla en küçük karelerle kolokasyon (EKKK) ve N jeoid yüksekliklerinden yararla bikübik splines fonksiyonları ile elde edilmiştir. Daha sonra Astrojeodezik ve astrogravimetrik jeoid hesabı yapılmış ve sonuçlar sunulmuştur. Kullanılan ölçü noktası sıklığının artmasının belirlenen jeoidin doğruluğu üzerinde etkili olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca astrojeodezik jeoide getirilen gravimetrik düzeltme ile elde edilen astrogravimetrik jeoidin daha doğru olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ancak astronomi ölçülerinin yeterli sayıda olmadığı da düşünülmektedir.
Özet (Çeviri)
SUMMARY STUDY ON THE DETERMINATION OF THE TURKISH ASTROGEODETIC AND ASTROGRAVIMETRIC GEOID As it is well known, all geodetic measurements are related to the earth's surface, however computations are performed on an ellipsoid. Geodesists employ various corrections or transformations to reduce their observations onto the ellipsoid. However, some measurements which are made on the earth's surface refer to another surface, the geoid. In geodetic surveying, one normally performs the computation of geodetic coordinates of points on an ellipsoid which closely approximates the size and the shape of the earth in the surveying area. Geoid can be defined as the surface to which the oceans conform over the entire earth. Geoid is an irregular surface due to the uneven distribution of the earth's mass. An ellipsoid, reversely, is a regular surface to which the geodetical calculations refer, and the differences between these two important surfaces are the geoid heights (geoid undulations) or geoid separations which stand for the distance between geoid and ellipsoid. It goes without saying that there is only one geoid for the earth, but an infinite number of ellipsoids. So, it is quite common to depict geoid undulations with reference to a particular ellipsoid, either earth-fixed or not. Geoid is a surface on which every point has the same gravity potential. The direction of the gravity is always perpendicular to surface of geoid. The geoid is assumed to continue under the lands. Despite its great conceptual meaning, determination of geoid is always in the hands of a few specialists in the world. This was due to the practical use of the heights above the mean sea level. It is quite possible to have orthometric corrections if there exist gravity observations around. So, from the practical point of view, people did not attempt to determine the geoid. There are, of course, other reasons why people are so late to determine geoid. These can be classified as the lack of data, ineffective computer facilities, etc. But today, especially with the advent of the Global Positioning System (GPS), it became compulsory to have a high-accurate geoid because GPS gives us ellipsoidal heights which are not used in most of the geodetic activities. It was then necessary to transform ellipsoidal height (h) to the orthometric height (H) by means of the geoid undulation. This VIis why geoid still constitutes one of the major topics of higher geodesy. The increase in the amount of related data and new computer facilities made it possible to determine geoid. There are various methods to determine geoid. These methods are named after the observations on which the determination is based. In this study, astrogeodetic and astrogravimetric geoid determination will be discussed. Astrogeodetic geoid to be explained in this study makes use of the astrogeodetic deflections of the vertical, whereas astrogravimetric geoid is determined by means of astrogeodetic and gravimetric deflections of the vertical as well as gravimetric geoid undulations. As it is seen clearly one can use different types of data separately or completely together. In most cases, the name of the geoid explains the types of the data used in the determination of the geoid. In this study, both the astrogeodetic and the astrogravimetric geoid determination are reviewed and various applications using different groups of data are made for Turkey. In the beginning, coordinate systems related to the astronomic and geodetic observations are discussed briefly. This is obviously necessary to understand the meaning of deflections of the vertical. As it is known, all measurements are made on the physical surface of the earth but computations are referred to the ellipsoid, either earth-fixed or not. Measurements made on the physical surface of the earth are referred to the level surfaces which do not allow to make computations. This is why scientists developed new surfaces which are proper for geodetic calculations. The geodetical problems in Turkey are solved by means of the positions or coordinates of the related points. These coordinates are defined according to the coordinate systems. The coordinate systems can be classified as natural and model(referance) coordinate systems. The coordinate systems give information on the definition of the deflections of the vertical. Deflections of the verticals are absolute or relative depending upon the ellipsoid which is used at geodetical works. Deflections of the vertical is absolute if the elipsoid used is earth-fixed, relative if the ellipsoid is local or relative. Geoids determined by absolute deflections of the vertical are absolute geoid, otherwise relative geoids if the deflections of the vertical are relative. Deflections of the vertical (DOV) are obtained by using different methods depending upon the different types of data. If necessary to make a classification, one can define the types of DOV as, astrogeodetic DOV, gravimetric DOV and topographic-isostatic DOV. Astrogeodetic DOV are obtained by comparing the astronomic latitude <E>, astronomic longitude A by geodetic latitude (p, geodetic longitude A. by the well-known equation vnÇ = 0-<p Tj = (A - X) cos (p Where £; and rj are the north-south and east-west components of the DOV, respectively. Total DOV 9 is calculated by means of the t, and T) with the equation; -47: 2 In this study, DOV are the backbone of the geoid determination. Astrogeodetic DOV are referred to European Datum 1950 (ED-50). Gravimetric DOV are referred to the earth gravity field and regarded as absolute DOV. There are various methods to obtain gravimetric DOV. In this study, least squares collocation (LSC), bicubic spline interpolations are used to obtain gravimetric DOV. As it is known, LSC is an effective method which allows the use of different types of data together. In this study, gravimetric DOV are obtained by gravity anomalies (Ag), using the program GEOCOL. Geopotential coefficients GPM2T-1 and indirect effect of residual Terrain Model (RTM) are taken into account. The fundamental equations used in LSC are given below for % and r\ respectively; £ = C2;AgC AgAgAS 4 T1 = C^AgC AgAgAg Where C-EAg Cross-covariance matrix for t, and Ag CpAp Cross-covariance matrix for tj and Ag C.. Auto-covariance matrix for Ag including Cnn error variance ? matrix. Ag Gravity anomalies. The main drawbacks of the LSC is to determine the local covariance function and the inverse of C matrix takes much computer time. Parameters of the local covarience function Variance Co, correlation length Ç0 and first-zero point \|f0 were determined by Ayhan, 1991 at an earlier study to determine Turkish gravimetric geoid TG-91. The same parameters are used in this study. Needless to say, most of the time is spent on taking the inverse of the C matrix. LSC gives the gravimetric DOV which do not take into account the indirect effect of the RTM and the contribution of geopotential coefficients. This is why indirect effects on gravimetric DOV are computed and added to LSC results. vuiThe second method to obtain gravimetric DOV is the bicubic spline inter polations which use the gridded data comprised of geodal heights at 3'x3' grid nodes computed by Ayhan E., 1991 during TG-91 determination. In this method, the relation between DOV components Ç, Tj and N geoidal heights is gives as; dx T] = dN dy In this method, each area comprised of four grid nodes is regarded a block. So, All the grid data is comprised of many blocks. Bicubic spline interpolation is a function which takes into account the continuity between blocks. Bicubic spline function can be given as; 3 3 t ı f(*.y) = z zaki (x-xi) (y-yp k=01=0 The problem here is to find the function value at point xi,yj. The solution lies in the coefficients a^-. In this study, indirect effects are calculated by means of the program, called TC, based on rectangular prism method and the Digital Terrain Model (DTM) consisting of heights at 15“x20”(450m x 450m) grid nodes and 5'x5' and 15'xl5' mean heights. After evaluating all the necessary data related to the geoid determination, two different methods are used sequentially, astrogeodetic geoid and astrogravimetric geoid. Astrogeodetic geoid is obtained by means of the well-known Helmert equation, (eA+ 6b) dN= NB-NA = - % S where S = elipsoidal distance between two points £a = ÇaCosccab + 7iASinocAB % = £b CosaAB + TlBSinaAB Here £a and eB are the components of the deflection of vertical on azimuth a. IXUsing Helmert's formula, Turkish astrogeodetic geoid was determined by different groups of data. In order to see the effect of the number of observations on geoid, 98 astrogeodetic DOV were used at first and 255, 274, 278, 297 DOV were used respectively. Each time loop closures are found to decrease as the number of DOV increased. A comparison was made between the common points. Astrogravimetric geoid determination requires gravimetric DOV's and N geoidal heights. In this study, gr standing for gravimetric, geodial height difference dN is found by the equation gr gr "(eA+eB) o r(eA + EB) -(eA+ eg) r (£A + eb; -i dN= \ W S+[ A2 S + NB-NAj The second term here stands for the gravimetric correction of the astronomical levelling which takes into account the nonlinearity of the variation of the astro-geodetic deflection of the vertical between two points. The great advantage of this procedure lies in the fact that the necessary density of astronomical points is much smaller (1 astronomical point to 100-200 km). After using these two methods, geoidal height differences are adjusted and. geoidal heights of the astronomical points are obtained with their root mean square (rms). In this adjustment, a new method, robust estimation which is sensitive to blunders (gross errors, outliers) is applied. During geoid determination, one of the points is held fixed and geoidal height of the other points are obtained with reference to this point. So, geoids determined by using different groups of data are relative, but differences in geoidal heights are assumed to be absolute and referred to ED-50 datum. The graphical results are represented by using the contour program CONTOUR. FOR developed for map drawing.
Benzer Tezler
- Türkiye astrojeodezik jeoidinin en küçük kareler yöntemiyle belirlenmesi
Astrogeodetic geoid of turkey determination with least squares method
AHMET TURAN YURDAKAN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
1998
Jeodezi ve FotogrametriKaradeniz Teknik ÜniversitesiJeodezi ve Fotogrametri Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. CELALETTİN KARAALİ
- Bir GPS ağı örneğinde 3 boyutlu dönüşüm modellerinin incelenmesi
The Study of the 3-D transformation models in a GPS network
SİS ALKAN
- 1981 Türkiye tarımsal yapısının önemli bileşenleri ve tarımsal bölgelerin elde edilmesi
Principle components of Turkey's agricultural structure and to determine agricultural rigions in 1981
İHSAN KARABULUT
- Türkiye'de trafik kazalarının epidemiyolojisi
Başlık çevirisi yok
HARUN KARACA
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
1985
UlaşımGazi ÜniversitesiKazalarda Acil Yardım ve Rehabilitasyon Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. HİKMET PEKCAN