Geri Dön

An Analysis of peer review of writing in a Bilkent University freshman English course

Bilkent Üniversitesi birinci sınıflar için İngilizce dersinde yer alan akran dönütü oturumlarının analizi

  1. Tez No: 89711
  2. Yazar: ÖZLEM AYAR
  3. Danışmanlar: DR. WİLLİAM E. SNYDER
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Eğitim ve Öğretim, Education and Training
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Akran dönütü, Dil öğretimi, Hazırlık sınıfları, Yabancı dil öğretimi, İngilizce, Peer feedback, Language teaching, Preparatory classes, Foreign language teaching, English
  7. Yıl: 1999
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce Öğretimi Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

ABSTRACT Title : An Analysis of Peer Review of Writing in a Bilkent University Freshman English Course Author : Özlem Ayar Advisor : Dr. William E. Snyder Bilkent University, MA TEFL Program Thesis Chairperson : Dr. Patricia N. Sullivan Bilkent University, MA TEFL Program Committee Members : Mr. David Palfreyman Ms. Michele Rajotte Bilkent University, MA TEFL Program This research study had two main goals. The first one was to find out how Bilkent University Freshman English students participated in peer review sessions. The second one was to find out the perceptions of Bilkent University Freshman English students of the effectiveness of the peer review sessions. The subjects of the study were three Bilkent University Freshman English students from the Economics Department. It was a case study, where, firstly, the researcher videotaped four peer review sessions of one peer review group. Next, the researcher conducted a group interview with the students in the peer review group. The interview had two parts. In the first part, the researcher asked the students ten questions that were determined according to the data obtained from the video recordings of the peer review sessions. In the second part of the interview the researcher asked the subjects' comments about some scenes in the second and the third peer review sessions. The interview was audiotaped and later both the videotapes and the audiotapes were transcribed for discourse analysis by the researcher. In this case study, the researcher analyzed the transcriptions of the peer review sessions in terms of Issues of Control, The Language That the Students Used,The Peer Review Sheets, and Revising After Peer Review Sessions. The researcher analyzed the transcriptions of the group interview under the following headings: Peer Review: Beneficial or Not, Incorporation of Peer Feedback, How to Make Peer Review More Effective, Training Before Peer Review Sessions, Peer Review Group Members, Using Native Language in Peer Review Sessions. According to the results, two of the three students were more expressive and they controlled the peer review sessions. Also, the student who was most expressive almost always went to his peers' papers for specific examples while the most quiet one generally used vague language and did not support his feedback with specific examples. The other student sometimes used vague language and sometimes supported his feedback with specific examples from his peers' papers. In this study, the researcher argues that the questions on the peer review sheets have an impact on students' language and suggests that the peer review sheets should have questions that promote discussion and urge the students to go to their peers' papers for specific examples to support their feedback. Moreover, all three students said that they benefited from the peer review sessions. However, two of the students never revised their writings after peer feedback while one revised only one. The students said that they did not revise because the mistakes that their peers pointed out were not important ones and they wanted to change their writings after they received feedback from their instructor. Finally, the limitations and pedagogical implications of the study are provided.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Instructors` perceptions of the content validity of the English language exams at Niğde University

    Niğde Üniversitesi İngilizce imtihanlarının içerik geçerliliği hakkında okutmanların görüşleri

    MAHMUT METİN AKSAN

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2001

    İngiliz Dili ve Edebiyatıİhsan Doğramacı Bilkent Üniversitesi

    DR. WİLLİAM E. SNYDER

  2. Arabuluculuk eğitiminin ilköğretim düzeyindeki bir grup öğrencinin çatışma çözme davranışlarına etkisinin incelenmesi

    A Study on an effect of peer mediation training on a group of students conflict resolution behaviors in the elementary school

    NERMİN KORUKLU (ÖNER)

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1998

    Eğitim ve ÖğretimAnkara Üniversitesi

    Eğitimde Psikolojik Hizmetler Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. UĞUR ÖNER

  3. Liderlik etkinliğinin ölçümü için bir model önerisi

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    ZEYNEP DİDEM DEMİRÖZLÜ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1998

    Endüstri ve Endüstri Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Endüstri Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. TUFAN VEHBİ KOÇ