Geri Dön

Strategic autonomy of the european union: A historicalinstitutuonalist analysis

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 841118
  2. Yazar: SERAY KILIÇ
  3. Danışmanlar: Belirtilmemiş.
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Uluslararası İlişkiler, International Relations
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2019
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: The Unıversıty Of Kent
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.

Özet

In June 2016, Federica Mogherini, the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy/Vice-President of the European Commission, presented the Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy and introduced the ambition of“strategic autonomy”referring to the ability to deter, respond to, and protect the Union against external threats autonomously. Although, realizing these grandiose aims requires high-end operational capabilities and capacities, the mechanisms developed for operational autonomy and developing capabilities for operational autonomy do not promise to serve the aim. The EU, in fact, in fact prioritize the industrial aspect of this ambition while the mechanisms such as the Euroepan Defence Fund, announced as a Commission initiative to foster competitiveness and innovativeness in European defence industry through funding defence-oriented research and development activities, and its forerunner, the Preparatory Action on Defence Research, are seen as“game-changers”. In this sense, the EU seems to tilt towards a pragmatic way, that is the EU prioritizes what proves achievable under the current conditions. In the light of these developments and arguments, this study aims to analyse whether the EU pursue pragmatic approach in handling the notion of strategic autonomy and whether this can be explained with endogenous factors, particularly the path-dependency of the institution. In pursue of this aim, the study borrows from historical institutionalism as the theoretical approach. Drawing on this theoretical background, the study scrutinizes the official documents and discourse from a historical perspective and also uses the primary data from various EU officials so as to present a full picture of institutional perspective. The study arrives into three conclusions. First, the EU has been clearly pursuing a pragmatic approach to strategic autonomy as it determines the degree of its autonomy according to the realities as in the case of its prudent balance between the Europeanist vs. Atlanticist division. Second, this pragmatic approach leads the EU to prioritize what is achievable for the realization of strategic autonomy under these conditions, that is moving on with the supranational mechanisms and keeping with the low-profile consensus due to member states divergences. Third, the way this pragmatism is handled in indus

Özet (Çeviri)

Özet çevirisi mevcut değil.

Benzer Tezler

  1. New algorithms and techniques for microprocessor-controlled PWM induction drives

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    OSMAN KÜKRER

    Doktora

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    1987

    Elektrik ve Elektronik MühendisliğiOrta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi

    Elektrik-Elektronik Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. H. BÜLENT ERTAN

  2. A Simulation application in a flow shop

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    A.CELAL KAPLAN

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    1987

    Endüstri ve Endüstri MühendisliğiOrta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi

    YRD. DOÇ. DR. NESİM ERKİP

  3. Stochastic modelling for extremes

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    AYŞEN DENER

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    1987

    İstatistikOrta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi

    YRD. DOÇ. DR. ENGİN SUNGUR

  4. Effects of soluble burnable poison on the age of a PWR core

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    SERHAT ALTEN

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    1987

    Nükleer MühendislikOrta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi

    DOÇ. DR. GÜNGÖR GÜNDÜZ