Geri Dön

How does pain feel? Verifiability and symptom endorsement in malingered, exaggerated, and genuine physical symptoms

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 799772
  2. Yazar: ALİ YUNUS EMRE AKCA
  3. Danışmanlar: DR. IRENA BOSKOVİC
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Nöroloji, Psikoloji, Neurology, Psychology
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Exaggeration, malingering, verifiability, endorsement, symptom reports
  7. Yıl: 2019
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Unıversıteıt Maastrıcht
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

Malingering is defined as intentional fabrication or gross exaggeration of symptoms for external benefit. The current study has investigated whether pure malingering, in which reported symptoms are nonexistent, and partial malingering, in which existent symptoms are exaggerated, could be differentiated by applying the Verifiability Approach (VA) and the Self-Report Symptom Inventory (SRSI). The logic behind the VA is that deceivers' statements contain more non-verifiable information, whereas truth tellers' accounts include more verifiable details. The SRSI taps into over-reporting by including a mix of genuine symptoms and implausible complaints (pseudosymptoms). Thus, we checked if pure malingerers, partial malingerers, and truth tellers can be differentiated in their statement (non)verifiability and symptom endorsement. Participants (N = 124) allocated to three conditions (pure malingerers vs. partial malingerers vs. truth tellers) were instructed to provide symptoms reports and fill out the SRSI. Findings revealed that malingerers overall produced lengthier statements and included more verifiable details in their statements than truth tellers. The groups did not differ regarding non-verifiable details. Truth tellers endorsed less symptoms of the SRSI than partial malingerers, but not than pure malingerers. Pure malingerers and partial malingerers did not differ mutually in statements' (non)verifiability nor in symptom endorsement. Overall, the study findings revealed that, when compared with truth tellers, partial malingerers (i.e., exaggerators) exhibited stronger over-reporting tendencies than pure malingerers. However, when mutually compared, the differentiation between fully fabricated complaints and exaggerated symptoms is limited using the VA and the SRSI.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Kur`anda akıl kavramına sık sık yapılan vurgunun önemi

    The in portance of the intelligace which is freguentiy explained in hold Quran

    HALİL AKTAŞ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1999

    DinAnkara Üniversitesi

    Temel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ŞEVKİ SAKA

  2. La notion de ressentiment dans la genèse des valeurs selon Friedrich Nietzsche et Max Scheler

    Friedrich Nietzsche ve Max Scheler'e göre değerlerin kökeninde hınç mefhumu

    SELİN MERVE CANTO

    Yüksek Lisans

    Fransızca

    Fransızca

    2013

    FelsefeGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ZEYNEP DIREK

  3. Türkiye'de taşınmaz kültür ve tabiat varlıklarını koruma olayı ve korumaya halkın katılımı konusunda yardımcı bir araştırma

    A Research to the conservation of historical monuments and natural environments with public porticipation in Turkey

    İSMET ŞAHİN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1990

    Şehircilik ve Bölge Planlamaİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    PROF. HANDE SUHER