Judicial review mechanisms in global administrative lawhow can international courts bring accountability to global governance?
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 770927
- Danışmanlar: PROF. DR. NİELS BLOKKER
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Hukuk, Law
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2022
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: Unıversıteıt Leıden
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.
Özet
In recent years, the classical international law perspective, which is based on inter-state relations, consent-based framework and sovereign equality of states, is being challenged by globalisation and global governance. The proliferation of global regulatory bodies and the increase in their areas of activities created pressure on the classical structure of international law. As a result of this process, today, the distinction between international law and domestic law is unclear, soft-law rules are commonly used, and most importantly, international law is considered less legitimate. Global Administrative Law (GAL) is one of the responses to this issue. GAL, as a concept, is based on the idea that global governance can be understood as an administration, and as it has been in domestic administrative law, administrative-law-like principles are emerging in global space, such as transparency, consultation, participation, reasoned decisions and review mechanisms. This thesis aims to analyse the judicial review mechanisms and their role in bringing accountability and legitimacy to global governance. Including the increasing activities of the international courts and tribunals, which attracts criticism and appraisals simultaneously, regional and national courts have also been actively involved with global affairs recently. While some arguing national authorities are wellsuited to review global regulatory bodies, others claim that the international courts are the better choice? However, even supporters of international courts cannot agree on mechanisms or procedures. Within this myriad of choices and approaches, in this study, it is suggested that the independent and impartial internal review mechanisms with compulsory jurisdiction and allowing private actors to refer this courts is the best way to achieve this goal
Özet (Çeviri)
Özet çevirisi mevcut değil.
Benzer Tezler
- Milletlerarası kaçakçılık suçları ve önlenmesinde milletlerarası polis ve adli işbirliği
Başlık çevirisi yok
SIRRI OĞUZ
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
1986
Kamu YönetimiGazi ÜniversitesiKamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. HASAN KÖNİ
- Ertuğrul Oğuz Fırat'ın yeni müzik anlayışı
Başlık çevirisi yok
FERZAN F. TÜZEL
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
1989
MüzikDokuz Eylül ÜniversitesiMüzik Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. NECATİ GEDİKLİ
- Türkiye Bankalar Birliği'nin yapısı, organizasyonu, faaliyetleri ve günümüzde Türk bankacılık sektörünün objektif bir değerlendirmesi
Başlık çevirisi yok
ÖMER NASUHİ ŞAHİN
- Milli Mücadele'den Cumhuriyet'e geçişte ve çok partili ilk sistemde basın-iktidar ilişkileri (1920-1927)
Başlık çevirisi yok
NURETTİN GÜZ
Doktora
Türkçe
1988
Türk İnkılap TarihiAnkara Üniversitesiİnkılap Tarihi Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. SÜLEYMAN ARSLAN