The problem of scientific method in light of popper's,kuhn's and lakatos' arguments
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 721202
- Danışmanlar: DR. ADAM TOON
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Sosyoloji, Sociology
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Scientific method, Popper, falsificationism, Kuhn, paradigm, scientific revolutions, Lakatos, scientific research programme
- Yıl: 2016
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: Unıversıty Of Exeter
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
The boundary between science and pseudoscience dates back to the time of Aristotle. In particular, this boundary caused a demarcation problem in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. One of the great advancements was attempted by logical positivists to draw a line between science and pseudoscience. Afterwards, Popper's philosophy was shaped by the demarcation problem. In light of Popper's philosophy, Kuhn's and Lakatos' scientific views have taken their place in the philosophy of science. Hence, great discussions have been initiated to address each of these philosophies. This dissertation is an examination of the problem of scientific method in Popper's, Kuhn's and Lakatos' methodologies in the philosophy of science. The main purpose of this study is to compare and analyse Popper's, Kuhn's and Lakatos' scientific views in terms of their similarities and differences, and to show how Lakatos' scientific view is more plausible than Popper's and Kuhn's philosophies. In particular, in the first chapter of the dissertation Popper's falsificationism is examined. This is because falsificationism as a scientific method forms the premise for shaping Kuhn's and Lakatos' scientific views. In the following section, the idea of paradigm and scientific revolution are addressed to explain Kuhn's scientific view. Some similarities and differences between Popper's and Kuhn's scientific views have been evaluated by comparing the two. In the last chapter of the study, Lakatos' scientific research programme is discussed in light of Popper's and Kuhn's philosophies, and is proposed as a plausible scientific method in the philosophy of science. In this study, in particular, Popper's, Kuhn's and Lakatos' philosophies have been chosen to examine them in 6 terms of their scientific methods, because this might be a new perspective to fill a gap in the literature.
Benzer Tezler
- Erken çocukluk döneminde bilim ve mühendislik uygulamalarının öğrencilerin bilimsel süreç becerilerine, karar verme ve problem çözme becerilerine etkisi
The effects of science and engineering applications on students ' scientific process skills, decision making and problem solving skills in early childhood
CANAN VURUCU
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2019
Eğitim ve ÖğretimMarmara Üniversitesiİlköğretim Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. FATMA ŞAHİN
- Mahkeme kararları ışığında sigortacılıkta adli bilimsel yöntemler
Forensic scientific methods in insurance in the light of court decisions
HARİKA DOĞAN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2025
SigortacılıkHitit ÜniversitesiAdli Bilimler Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ VEYSEL DİNLER
- Birlikte-varolma ilkesi ışığında fenomenal bilinç sorununun yeniden formülasyonu
Reformulating the problem of phenomenal consciousness in light of the principle of co-being
SEDEF KARAKAŞ
- Probleme dayalı öğrenmenin ortaokul öğrencilerinin bilimsel süreç becerilerine, tutumlarına ve başarılarına etkisinin incelenmesi: Işık Ünitesi örneği
Investigating the effect of problem-based learning on the scientific process skills, scientific attitudes, achievements and conceptual knowledge of middle school: Unit light
HÜLYA SÖYLEYİCİ
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2018
Eğitim ve ÖğretimTrakya ÜniversitesiMatematik ve Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. YILMAZ ÇAKICI
- Geleneksel İslam anlayışı ve modern perspektifler ışığında erken çocuklukta din eğitimi
Religious education in early childhood in the light of traditional Islamic understanding and modern perspectives
SÜMEYYA BERK
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2025
Dinİnönü ÜniversitesiFelsefe ve Din Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. CEMİL ORUÇ
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ MEHMET SU