17. yüzyıl İstanbul mescitleri
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 55965
- Danışmanlar: PROF. DR. SEMRA ÖGEL
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Mimarlık, Architecture
- Anahtar Kelimeler: 17. yüzyıl, Mescitler, Mimarlık tarihi, İstanbul, 17. century, Masjids, Architectural history, Istanbul
- Yıl: 1996
- Dil: Türkçe
- Üniversite: İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.
Özet
The masjids explained below could come today in parallel to the given information. When we look at the building complex, we are going to pay attention to 2 important points. First point is the position of the building complex in the centrum that the masjid placed in, second point is the position of the masjid in this building complex. The most important and central road of Istanbul was Divanyolu in Byzantine and also in Ottoman empire times. Divanyolu maintained its importance in later centuries. Main reasons of this were the first Ottoman palace which was built by Mehmet the 2nd and Topkapi Palace. Because of these palaces Divanyolu has never lost its popularity. Also the palaces which were built by the other emperors and pashas in 17. century have been placed around Divanyolu, too (i.e. Building complexes of Merzifonlu Kara Mustafa Pasha, Köprülü and Kuyucu Murat Pasha). In general smaller building complexes in the 17. century have been planned in an untidy design according to the environmental architecture and plans of the surrounding streets (i.e. Köprülü and Bayram Pasha complexes) or they have not a strictly arranged plan (i.e. Kuyucu Murat Pasha complex). While big Sultan complexes which were built in Istanbul at the 15. and 16. centuries becoming a defining factor for the architecture of the whole city, later building complexes which were built in the 17. century were influenced by the enviromental architecture. In Ottoman Empire times in Üsküdar, an important part of the city, Çinili complex has been built by Kösem Sultan in an untidy style which was arranged according to the streets surrounding. In these building complexes which were built in the 17. century, the triple of medrese-türbe-sebil gained a certain character and also masjid was thought together with the classroom of the whole complex. In the first half of this century square-planned classroom-masjid buildings (similar to the medrese of Kuyucu Murat Pasha building complex) joining with the rooms of the medrese part, converted into the multigonal planned masses separated from the medrese rooms in 1660. Best example for this style can be observed in Köprülü building complex. But a more earlier example is in the masjid of Bayrampaşa Tekkesi. The arrangement of the rooms of the Tekke and the position of the masjid building are similar to each other in both complexes. In these style of building complexes, masjid-classroom combination are the main parts of the building complex according to the plans and the characteristics of the mass. In the 17. century some of the masjids built in Istanbul converted into Tekkes because of the sheiks (vaz-ı meşihat). In this century some specific tekkes which.xviii
Özet (Çeviri)
were built just for this aim are very rare. Masjids converted into tekkes became bigger building complexes with some additions. The masjid plans of these tekkes did not change. In Istanbul all hans beginning with Fatih complex and continuing for 4 or 5 centuries shows different functional styles. In these hans the masjid buildings are the praying places for the traders and places for important announcements and forums. When all these factors are considered it can be deduced that the architectural style of masjid hasn't been improved through the years much until the 17. century and during that century masjids were grouped according to their functions and localizations so that they had differences from group to group but similarities only if they were in the same group. xixThe masjids explained below could come today in parallel to the given information. When we look at the building complex, we are going to pay attention to 2 important points. First point is the position of the building complex in the centrum that the masjid placed in, second point is the position of the masjid in this building complex. The most important and central road of Istanbul was Divanyolu in Byzantine and also in Ottoman empire times. Divanyolu maintained its importance in later centuries. Main reasons of this were the first Ottoman palace which was built by Mehmet the 2nd and Topkapi Palace. Because of these palaces Divanyolu has never lost its popularity. Also the palaces which were built by the other emperors and pashas in 17. century have been placed around Divanyolu, too (i.e. Building complexes of Merzifonlu Kara Mustafa Pasha, Köprülü and Kuyucu Murat Pasha). In general smaller building complexes in the 17. century have been planned in an untidy design according to the environmental architecture and plans of the surrounding streets (i.e. Köprülü and Bayram Pasha complexes) or they have not a strictly arranged plan (i.e. Kuyucu Murat Pasha complex). While big Sultan complexes which were built in Istanbul at the 15. and 16. centuries becoming a defining factor for the architecture of the whole city, later building complexes which were built in the 17. century were influenced by the enviromental architecture. In Ottoman Empire times in Üsküdar, an important part of the city, Çinili complex has been built by Kösem Sultan in an untidy style which was arranged according to the streets surrounding. In these building complexes which were built in the 17. century, the triple of medrese-türbe-sebil gained a certain character and also masjid was thought together with the classroom of the whole complex. In the first half of this century square-planned classroom-masjid buildings (similar to the medrese of Kuyucu Murat Pasha building complex) joining with the rooms of the medrese part, converted into the multigonal planned masses separated from the medrese rooms in 1660. Best example for this style can be observed in Köprülü building complex. But a more earlier example is in the masjid of Bayrampaşa Tekkesi. The arrangement of the rooms of the Tekke and the position of the masjid building are similar to each other in both complexes. In these style of building complexes, masjid-classroom combination are the main parts of the building complex according to the plans and the characteristics of the mass. In the 17. century some of the masjids built in Istanbul converted into Tekkes because of the sheiks (vaz-ı meşihat). In this century some specific tekkes which.xviiiwere built just for this aim are very rare. Masjids converted into tekkes became bigger building complexes with some additions. The masjid plans of these tekkes did not change. In Istanbul all hans beginning with Fatih complex and continuing for 4 or 5 centuries shows different functional styles. In these hans the masjid buildings are the praying places for the traders and places for important announcements and forums. When all these factors are considered it can be deduced that the architectural style of masjid hasn't been improved through the years much until the 17. century and during that century masjids were grouped according to their functions and localizations so that they had differences from group to group but similarities only if they were in the same group. xixThe masjids explained below could come today in parallel to the given information. When we look at the building complex, we are going to pay attention to 2 important points. First point is the position of the building complex in the centrum that the masjid placed in, second point is the position of the masjid in this building complex. The most important and central road of Istanbul was Divanyolu in Byzantine and also in Ottoman empire times. Divanyolu maintained its importance in later centuries. Main reasons of this were the first Ottoman palace which was built by Mehmet the 2nd and Topkapi Palace. Because of these palaces Divanyolu has never lost its popularity. Also the palaces which were built by the other emperors and pashas in 17. century have been placed around Divanyolu, too (i.e. Building complexes of Merzifonlu Kara Mustafa Pasha, Köprülü and Kuyucu Murat Pasha). In general smaller building complexes in the 17. century have been planned in an untidy design according to the environmental architecture and plans of the surrounding streets (i.e. Köprülü and Bayram Pasha complexes) or they have not a strictly arranged plan (i.e. Kuyucu Murat Pasha complex). While big Sultan complexes which were built in Istanbul at the 15. and 16. centuries becoming a defining factor for the architecture of the whole city, later building complexes which were built in the 17. century were influenced by the enviromental architecture. In Ottoman Empire times in Üsküdar, an important part of the city, Çinili complex has been built by Kösem Sultan in an untidy style which was arranged according to the streets surrounding. In these building complexes which were built in the 17. century, the triple of medrese-türbe-sebil gained a certain character and also masjid was thought together with the classroom of the whole complex. In the first half of this century square-planned classroom-masjid buildings (similar to the medrese of Kuyucu Murat Pasha building complex) joining with the rooms of the medrese part, converted into the multigonal planned masses separated from the medrese rooms in 1660. Best example for this style can be observed in Köprülü building complex. But a more earlier example is in the masjid of Bayrampaşa Tekkesi. The arrangement of the rooms of the Tekke and the position of the masjid building are similar to each other in both complexes. In these style of building complexes, masjid-classroom combination are the main parts of the building complex according to the plans and the characteristics of the mass. In the 17. century some of the masjids built in Istanbul converted into Tekkes because of the sheiks (vaz-ı meşihat). In this century some specific tekkes which.xviiiwere built just for this aim are very rare. Masjids converted into tekkes became bigger building complexes with some additions. The masjid plans of these tekkes did not change. In Istanbul all hans beginning with Fatih complex and continuing for 4 or 5 centuries shows different functional styles. In these hans the masjid buildings are the praying places for the traders and places for important announcements and forums. When all these factors are considered it can be deduced that the architectural style of masjid hasn't been improved through the years much until the 17. century and during that century masjids were grouped according to their functions and localizations so that they had differences from group to group but similarities only if they were in the same group. xix
Benzer Tezler
- Bir geçiş dönemi olarak İstanbul`da 3. Ahmet Devri mimarisi
Ottoman architecture in İstanbul during the period of Ahmet 3. (1703-1730)
GÜLÇİN CANCA
Doktora
Türkçe
1999
Sanat TarihiMimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar ÜniversitesiSanat Tarihi Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. ZEKİ SÖNMEZ
- Testing and evaluation of Konaklar Railway Bridge
Konaklar Demiryolu Köprüsünün değerlendirmesi ve rafine bir bilgisayar modelinin hazırlanması
CANES AVCI
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
1998
İnşaat Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesiİnşaat Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. ERDOĞAN UZGİDER
- Economic and social life in late seventeenth century İstanbul: The İstanbul court records of 1107-1108 (1696-1697 AD)
Onyedinci yüzyıl İstanbul'unda ve sosyal hayat 1107-1108 (1696-1697 MS) İstanbul mahkemesi kayıtları
YONCA KÖKSAL
- 17 - 19. yüzyıl İstanbul sebillerindeki madeni şebekeler
Metal lattices of Istanbul sebils between 17th - 19th centuries
GÜL SARIDİKMEN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2001
Sanat TarihiÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart ÜniversitesiSanat Tarihi Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. NECLA ARSLAN SEVİN
- XVIII.yüzyıl ve XIX yüzyıl İstanbul camilerinde antik öğeler
Antique elements of 18 th and 19 th century in İstanbul mosques
M.ECE IŞIK(ÇALDIRAN)