A metaphilosophical reading of Plato's Phaedo
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 544610
- Danışmanlar: Dr. JOACHIM AUFDERHEIDE, Prof. RAPHAEL WOOLF
- Tez Türü: Doktora
- Konular: Felsefe, Philosophy
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2018
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: Kıng's College London
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
Although many of Plato's dialogues contain reflections on the correct method of philosophical argument, scholars have not paid sufficient attention to the Phaedo in this regard. This thesis explores Plato's Phaedo from an overlooked perspective, namely its metaphilosophical component and its prescriptions on the correct philosophical practice. The findings presented in this thesis thus help to better understand Plato's thoughts on philosophical argument and the possibility of human knowledge. In Chapter 1 and 2, I present a theoretical framework of the epistemic (or intellectual) norms governing the correct philosophical conversation and argument. I claim that metaphilosophy is a significant component of the Phaedo and the epistemic norms rely on the idea of philosophical humility. Chapter 3 examines Socrates' so-called defence speech at the Phaedo 63-69. I argue that the content of the defence partially shapes the epistemic norms that are developed and put into practice in the Phaedo. I suggest that Socrates' defence speech specifies the limits of human cognition and that the concept of philosophical humility should arise out of the recognition of these limits. In Chapter 4, I scrutinize the argument against misology presented at Phaedo 88-91. I argue that the misology argument is metaphilosophical in the sense that it stresses the danger of putting all our trust in arguments before possessing expertise in argument; hence the misology argument adds to the correct epistemic norms governing philosophical inquiry. Chapter 5 investigates Socrates' autobiography portrayed in the Phaedo 96-101, with special emphasis on the meaning of second-sailing. I offer a novel interpretation of the second-sailing according to which the distinction is not simply between the best and the second-best method, but another contrast stems from the purpose-relative aspect of Socrates' choice.
Benzer Tezler
- Le rapport des droits de l'homme au politique: Lefort et Rancière
İnsan haklarının politik-olan bağlantısı: Lefort ve Rancière
EYLEM YOLSAL MURTEZA
Doktora
Fransızca
2022
FelsefeGalatasaray ÜniversitesiFelsefe Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. ALİYE KARABÜK KOVANLIKAYA
- Question concerning the universality of human rights: A comparative examination of the works of Donnelly, Nino and Ferry and Renaut
İnsan haklarının evrenselliği sorunu: Donnelly, Nino, ve Ferry ve Renaut`un çalışmaları üzerine karşılaştırmalı inceleme
MEHMET RUHİ DEMİRAY
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2003
FelsefeOrta Doğu Teknik ÜniversitesiSiyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. CEM DEVECİ
- Therapeutic planning based on the storytelling of individual traumas: Narratives from veddel neighbourhood
Bireysel travmaların hikaye anlatımına dayalı terapötik planlama: Veddel mahallesinden anlatımlar
AMIRHOSSEIN ETEMADI
Doktora
İngilizce
2023
Şehircilik ve Bölge Planlamaİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiŞehir ve Bölge Planlama Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. EDA BEYAZIT İNCE
- Devletin, uluslararası ilişkilerin ve devlet merkezli pozitivist uluslararası ilişkiler teorilerinde ontolojik varsayımsallığın kökeni
The origin of the state, international relations and the onthological presuppositions in state centered positivist international relations theories
İSMAİL HASAN CAN COŞKUN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2019
Uluslararası İlişkilerBahçeşehir ÜniversitesiKüresel Siyaset ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ MAHMUT DENİZ TANSİ