Çukurova Bölgesinde farklı azot dozu gübrelemesi, insektisit tipi ve uygulamalarının pamuğun (gossypium hirsutum l.) özellikle yapışkanlık sorunu olmak üzere verim ve kalite unsurlarına etkisi üzerine bir araştırma
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 38846
- Danışmanlar: PROF.DR. OKTAY GENÇER
- Tez Türü: Doktora
- Konular: Ziraat, Agriculture
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Azotlu gübreler, Pamuk, Tarla bitkileri, Yapışkanlık, Çukurova bölgesi, Nitrogen fertilizers, Cotton, Field crops, Adhesiveness, Çukurova region
- Yıl: 1995
- Dil: Türkçe
- Üniversite: Çukurova Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.
Özet
311 seed weight and fiber yield for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line in 1991; on number of bolls, earliness ratio, number of carpels per boll for cv. of Çukurova 1518; on number of vegetative branches, seed cotton yield and fiber yield for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line, in 1992. 5. N level x number of spraying treatments interaction did not lead to any difference on number of vegetative branches, number of carpels per boll, seed cotton weight of boll and ginning outturn on both genotypes in 1991 and 1992; had great effect on boll weight and fiber yield for cv. of Çukurova 1518, and on 100 seed weight and fiber yield for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line in 1991; on number of fruit bearing branches, number of bolls, earliness ratio for cv. of Çukurova 1518, and on plant height fiber yield for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line, in 1992; and on seed cotton yield for both of two genotpes, in two experimental years. 6. Insecticide groups x number of spraying treatments interaction, did not lead to any difference on number of vegetative and sympodial branches, number of bolls, number of carpels per boll, boll weight, seed cotton weight of boll, ginning outturn and 100 seed weight for both genotypes in 1991 and 1992; had great impact on plant height on cv. of Çukurova 1518; on fiber yield, seed cotton yield, and earliness ratio for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line, in 1991; on fiber yield for both of two genotypes; and on earliness ratio for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line in 1992. 7. N level x insecticide group x number of spraying treatments interaction caused great difference on number of bolls for cv. of Çukurova 1518; on earliness ratio and fiber yield for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line in 1991; on boll weight for cv. of çukurova 1518; on number of bolls, earliness ratio for çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line and on fiber yield on both of genotypes in 1992; on seed cotton yield for both of two genotypes in 1991 and 1992. As for the results concerning technological properties, 1. N treatments did not cause to any difference on any of the fiber characteristics in 1 991 ; had great impact on fiber strength, maturity ratio, percentage of mature fibers for cv. of çukurova 1518; on maturity ratio, micronaire, percentage of mature fibers and fiber fineness for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line in 1992; on fiber stickiness degrees determined by Thermodetector, Minicard and Perkins test methods on both of two genotypes in 1991 and 1992. 2. Insecticide group treatments did not lead to any difference on 50 and 2.5 fiber length, uniformity ratio, fiber strength, elongation, maturity ratio, percentage mature fibers, fiber stickiness degrees determined by Thermodetector and Minicard test methods in both of two years; had great impact on micronaire, fiber fineness and fiber stickiness degrees determined by Perkins test method for Çukurova 1 51 8 okra isogenic line in 1 992. 3. Number of spraying treatments did not lead to any difference on 50 and 2.5 fiber length, uniformity ratio for both of two genotypes in 1991 and 1992; had great impact on uniformity ratio for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line; on elongation for cv. of Çukurova312 1518 in 1991; on micronaire, maturity ratio, percentage of mature fibers, fiber fineness on both of two genotypes in 1991; fiber stickiness degrees determined by Thermodetector, Minicard and Perkins test methods for both of two genotypes and both of experiment years. 4. N level x insecticide group interaction did not lead to any difference on 50 % fiber length, fiber strength, maturity ratio, percentage mature fibers, fiber stickiness degrees determined by Thermodetector, Minicard and Perkins test methods for both of two genotypes and both of experiment years; had great effect on uniformity ratio of cv. of Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line, in 1991; on micronaire for cv. of Çukurova 1518 ; on 2.5 % fiber length, micronaire and fiber fineness for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line, in 1992. 5. N level x number of insecticide spraying treatments interaction did not lead to any difference on any fiber characteristics studied for both of two genotypes and both of experiment years; had great effect on fiber stickiness degrees determined by Thermodetector test method for both of genotpes, in 1991 and 1992; on fiber stickiness degrees determined by Minicard test method for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line, in 1992. 6. Insecticide group x number of insecticide sprayings treatments interaction did not lead to any difference on elongation, micronaire, maturity ratio, percentage mature fibers, fiber fineness, fiber stickiness degrees determined by Thermodetector, Minicard and Perkins test methods for any of genotypes, in 1991 and 1992; had great effect on 50 and 2.5 % fiber length for cv. of Çukurova 1518, in 1991; on 50 % fiber length for cv. of Çukurova 1518, in 1992; on uniformity ratio and fiber stickiness degrees determined by Thermodetector test method for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line, in 1992. 7. N level x insecticide group x number of spraying treatments interaction did not cause to any difference on any fiber characteristics studied.311 seed weight and fiber yield for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line in 1991; on number of bolls, earliness ratio, number of carpels per boll for cv. of Çukurova 1518; on number of vegetative branches, seed cotton yield and fiber yield for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line, in 1992. 5. N level x number of spraying treatments interaction did not lead to any difference on number of vegetative branches, number of carpels per boll, seed cotton weight of boll and ginning outturn on both genotypes in 1991 and 1992; had great effect on boll weight and fiber yield for cv. of Çukurova 1518, and on 100 seed weight and fiber yield for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line in 1991; on number of fruit bearing branches, number of bolls, earliness ratio for cv. of Çukurova 1518, and on plant height fiber yield for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line, in 1992; and on seed cotton yield for both of two genotpes, in two experimental years. 6. Insecticide groups x number of spraying treatments interaction, did not lead to any difference on number of vegetative and sympodial branches, number of bolls, number of carpels per boll, boll weight, seed cotton weight of boll, ginning outturn and 100 seed weight for both genotypes in 1991 and 1992; had great impact on plant height on cv. of Çukurova 1518; on fiber yield, seed cotton yield, and earliness ratio for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line, in 1991; on fiber yield for both of two genotypes; and on earliness ratio for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line in 1992. 7. N level x insecticide group x number of spraying treatments interaction caused great difference on number of bolls for cv. of Çukurova 1518; on earliness ratio and fiber yield for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line in 1991; on boll weight for cv. of çukurova 1518; on number of bolls, earliness ratio for çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line and on fiber yield on both of genotypes in 1992; on seed cotton yield for both of two genotypes in 1991 and 1992. As for the results concerning technological properties, 1. N treatments did not cause to any difference on any of the fiber characteristics in 1 991 ; had great impact on fiber strength, maturity ratio, percentage of mature fibers for cv. of çukurova 1518; on maturity ratio, micronaire, percentage of mature fibers and fiber fineness for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line in 1992; on fiber stickiness degrees determined by Thermodetector, Minicard and Perkins test methods on both of two genotypes in 1991 and 1992. 2. Insecticide group treatments did not lead to any difference on 50 and 2.5 fiber length, uniformity ratio, fiber strength, elongation, maturity ratio, percentage mature fibers, fiber stickiness degrees determined by Thermodetector and Minicard test methods in both of two years; had great impact on micronaire, fiber fineness and fiber stickiness degrees determined by Perkins test method for Çukurova 1 51 8 okra isogenic line in 1 992. 3. Number of spraying treatments did not lead to any difference on 50 and 2.5 fiber length, uniformity ratio for both of two genotypes in 1991 and 1992; had great impact on uniformity ratio for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line; on elongation for cv. of Çukurova
Özet (Çeviri)
312 1518 in 1991; on micronaire, maturity ratio, percentage of mature fibers, fiber fineness on both of two genotypes in 1991; fiber stickiness degrees determined by Thermodetector, Minicard and Perkins test methods for both of two genotypes and both of experiment years. 4. N level x insecticide group interaction did not lead to any difference on 50 % fiber length, fiber strength, maturity ratio, percentage mature fibers, fiber stickiness degrees determined by Thermodetector, Minicard and Perkins test methods for both of two genotypes and both of experiment years; had great effect on uniformity ratio of cv. of Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line, in 1991; on micronaire for cv. of Çukurova 1518 ; on 2.5 % fiber length, micronaire and fiber fineness for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line, in 1992. 5. N level x number of insecticide spraying treatments interaction did not lead to any difference on any fiber characteristics studied for both of two genotypes and both of experiment years; had great effect on fiber stickiness degrees determined by Thermodetector test method for both of genotpes, in 1991 and 1992; on fiber stickiness degrees determined by Minicard test method for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line, in 1992. 6. Insecticide group x number of insecticide sprayings treatments interaction did not lead to any difference on elongation, micronaire, maturity ratio, percentage mature fibers, fiber fineness, fiber stickiness degrees determined by Thermodetector, Minicard and Perkins test methods for any of genotypes, in 1991 and 1992; had great effect on 50 and 2.5 % fiber length for cv. of Çukurova 1518, in 1991; on 50 % fiber length for cv. of Çukurova 1518, in 1992; on uniformity ratio and fiber stickiness degrees determined by Thermodetector test method for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line, in 1992. 7. N level x insecticide group x number of spraying treatments interaction did not cause to any difference on any fiber characteristics studied.311 seed weight and fiber yield for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line in 1991; on number of bolls, earliness ratio, number of carpels per boll for cv. of Çukurova 1518; on number of vegetative branches, seed cotton yield and fiber yield for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line, in 1992. 5. N level x number of spraying treatments interaction did not lead to any difference on number of vegetative branches, number of carpels per boll, seed cotton weight of boll and ginning outturn on both genotypes in 1991 and 1992; had great effect on boll weight and fiber yield for cv. of Çukurova 1518, and on 100 seed weight and fiber yield for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line in 1991; on number of fruit bearing branches, number of bolls, earliness ratio for cv. of Çukurova 1518, and on plant height fiber yield for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line, in 1992; and on seed cotton yield for both of two genotpes, in two experimental years. 6. Insecticide groups x number of spraying treatments interaction, did not lead to any difference on number of vegetative and sympodial branches, number of bolls, number of carpels per boll, boll weight, seed cotton weight of boll, ginning outturn and 100 seed weight for both genotypes in 1991 and 1992; had great impact on plant height on cv. of Çukurova 1518; on fiber yield, seed cotton yield, and earliness ratio for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line, in 1991; on fiber yield for both of two genotypes; and on earliness ratio for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line in 1992. 7. N level x insecticide group x number of spraying treatments interaction caused great difference on number of bolls for cv. of Çukurova 1518; on earliness ratio and fiber yield for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line in 1991; on boll weight for cv. of çukurova 1518; on number of bolls, earliness ratio for çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line and on fiber yield on both of genotypes in 1992; on seed cotton yield for both of two genotypes in 1991 and 1992. As for the results concerning technological properties, 1. N treatments did not cause to any difference on any of the fiber characteristics in 1 991 ; had great impact on fiber strength, maturity ratio, percentage of mature fibers for cv. of çukurova 1518; on maturity ratio, micronaire, percentage of mature fibers and fiber fineness for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line in 1992; on fiber stickiness degrees determined by Thermodetector, Minicard and Perkins test methods on both of two genotypes in 1991 and 1992. 2. Insecticide group treatments did not lead to any difference on 50 and 2.5 fiber length, uniformity ratio, fiber strength, elongation, maturity ratio, percentage mature fibers, fiber stickiness degrees determined by Thermodetector and Minicard test methods in both of two years; had great impact on micronaire, fiber fineness and fiber stickiness degrees determined by Perkins test method for Çukurova 1 51 8 okra isogenic line in 1 992. 3. Number of spraying treatments did not lead to any difference on 50 and 2.5 fiber length, uniformity ratio for both of two genotypes in 1991 and 1992; had great impact on uniformity ratio for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line; on elongation for cv. of Çukurova312 1518 in 1991; on micronaire, maturity ratio, percentage of mature fibers, fiber fineness on both of two genotypes in 1991; fiber stickiness degrees determined by Thermodetector, Minicard and Perkins test methods for both of two genotypes and both of experiment years. 4. N level x insecticide group interaction did not lead to any difference on 50 % fiber length, fiber strength, maturity ratio, percentage mature fibers, fiber stickiness degrees determined by Thermodetector, Minicard and Perkins test methods for both of two genotypes and both of experiment years; had great effect on uniformity ratio of cv. of Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line, in 1991; on micronaire for cv. of Çukurova 1518 ; on 2.5 % fiber length, micronaire and fiber fineness for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line, in 1992. 5. N level x number of insecticide spraying treatments interaction did not lead to any difference on any fiber characteristics studied for both of two genotypes and both of experiment years; had great effect on fiber stickiness degrees determined by Thermodetector test method for both of genotpes, in 1991 and 1992; on fiber stickiness degrees determined by Minicard test method for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line, in 1992. 6. Insecticide group x number of insecticide sprayings treatments interaction did not lead to any difference on elongation, micronaire, maturity ratio, percentage mature fibers, fiber fineness, fiber stickiness degrees determined by Thermodetector, Minicard and Perkins test methods for any of genotypes, in 1991 and 1992; had great effect on 50 and 2.5 % fiber length for cv. of Çukurova 1518, in 1991; on 50 % fiber length for cv. of Çukurova 1518, in 1992; on uniformity ratio and fiber stickiness degrees determined by Thermodetector test method for Çukurova 1518 okra isogenic line, in 1992. 7. N level x insecticide group x number of spraying treatments interaction did not cause to any difference on any fiber characteristics studied.
Benzer Tezler
- Çukurova bölgesinde önemli tarla ürünlerinde gübre kullanımının ekonomik analizi
An Economic analysis of fertilizer use on major field crops in Çukurova region
SELAHATTİN ÇINAR
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
1999
ZiraatÇukurova ÜniversitesiTarım Ekonomisi Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. ŞİNASİ AKDEMİR
- Çukurova koşullarında Burley (Nicotiana tobacum L.) tütünlerinde farklı azot uygulamalarının verim ve bazı verim ögelerine etkisi ve uygun azot dozunun saptanması üzerinde bir araştırma
Başlık çevirisi yok
RAMAZAN KAYA
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
1992
ZiraatÇukurova ÜniversitesiTarla Bitkileri Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. MENŞURE ÖZGÜVEN