Borçlunun bazı mallarının haczedilememesi ve nedenleri (Haczedilmezlik ve nedenleri)
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 37356
- Danışmanlar: PROF.DR. RAMAZAN ARSLAN
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Hukuk, Law
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Borçlar hukuku, Borçlu, Haciz, İcra, İcra hukuku, Law of obligations, Debtor, Attachment, Enforcement (Hukuk), Enforcement law
- Yıl: 1994
- Dil: Türkçe
- Üniversite: Ankara Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
SUMMARY This study about“unconfiscatibitity of some properties of the debtor and its causes”is mainly consisted of one introduction, four parts and one conclusion respectively. Having briefly examined the developmental process of concepts related to debt, responsibility and confiscation under compulsion, subsequently general informations are given about confiscation. Having examined unconfiscatibility both in narrow and brood sense, firstly unconfiscatibility is deeply examined according to Material law that we name unconfiscatibility in brood sense. Furf- hermore, properties that can not be confiscated. Because they can not be tun ned according to Material Law and properties that can not be confiscated, too, as regor'ds their attributes are seperately elaborated. As for the second Part refers to unconfiscatibility according to the Law of Execution and Bankruptcy, herewith, unconfiscateable properties and righs disposed as 12 paragraphs in the article 82 in the Law of Execution and Bank ruptcy are diligently examined. The other situations of unconfiscatibility broght up by special dispositions aport from LEB, chiefly constitutes the subject of third part. Here, too, according to the Regulation of Turkish Law, unconfiscabi- \ lity broght up by special Law Judgements are explicity examined and manifes ted. As for fourth part corresponds to the exceptions of unconfiscatibility and problematic issves emerging on the condition that the Judgements of unconfis catibility are appiied. This study terminates in a general evaluation and a conc lusion including proposals and critiques. tuAwltaiMiTASVfllul Mmwd m 305
Benzer Tezler
- Türk Medeni Hukukunda akıl hastalığı sebebiyle boşanma
Divorce due to the insanity in Turkish civil Law
ABDULLAH GÖK
- İslam Hukukunda sebepsiz zenginleşme
Unjustifiable enrichment in the Islamıc Law
MUZAFFER ŞAHİN
Doktora
Türkçe
2000
DinAnkara ÜniversitesiTemel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. İBRAHİM ÇALIŞKAN
- Gelişen ülkelerin 1973 sonrası dış borç sorunları ve çözüm önerileri
Başlık çevirisi yok
BURHAN AYDEMİR
