Geri Dön

Türk ve İran hukukunda karşılıksız çek

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 26017
  2. Yazar: REZA GHİASİ
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF. DR. SABİH ARKAN
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Hukuk, Law
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Karşılıksız çek, Ticaret hukuku, Türk hukuku, Çekler, Özel hukuk, İran hukuku, Bad check, Commercial law, Turkish law, Cheques, Private law, Iran law
  7. Yıl: 1993
  8. Dil: Türkçe
  9. Üniversite: Ankara Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Özel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

133 SUMMARY The content of our study contains“Dud cheque in Turkish and Iranian Laws”and is composed of six chapters beginning with“Introduction chapter”. After having mentioned in introduction chapter that cheque is a kind of payment mean, alterations and modification to which Turkish and Iranian regulations have faced and history of cheque have been discussed. Studying the introduction chapter in this way, first chapter of our study covers the dud cheque drawing in Turkish and Iranian Laws. Following the discussions held on what the dud cheques mean, discussions have especially been concentrated on the identification of cases causing to dud cheques in both regulations: Whereas in the second chapter, the results of dud cheque drawing in Turkish Law have been examined with respect to its specific Law. In this chapter after having mentioned the occurrence of application rights of recourse debtors due to such dud cheques and its scope, the obligations of account bearer and concerned bank have been studied. The final part of this chapter has been reserved for compensation right. In third chapter, the penal results of dud cheque drawing have been studies. The content of this chapter especially contains components, makers, corroborations and proceeding provisions of dud cheque drawing. In fourth chapter, results of dud cheque drawing in Iran have been studied with respect to specific Law. Especially, on one hand, the occurrence and scope of application right of bearer to recourse debtors and also obligations of concerned bank on the other hand, have been studied. As for in fifth chapter, penal results of dud cheque drawing in Iran have been studied. The content of this chapter especially contains components, makers, corroborations and proceeding provisions of dud cheque drawing.134 So as in sixth chapter, judgments for dud cheque in Turkey and in Iran have been comparet with each other. This comparison is primarily held on regarding legal and penal corroborations applied to dud cheques in both regulations and especially on transition of cheque allowance, follow-up procedure, obligations of concerned bank and compensation right.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Türk ve İran Hukuklarında boşanma nedenleri

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    JİLA EDALAT

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1988

    Hukukİstanbul Üniversitesi
  2. Türk ve İran Hukukunda kambiyo senetlerinde sahtecilik ve tahrifat

    Falsification and corruption an the bills of exchange under the Turkis and persian laws

    REZA GHİASİ

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1998

    HukukAnkara Üniversitesi

    Özel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. NURKUT İNAN

  3. Türkiye ve İran Hukuklarında anonim ortaklık yönetim kurulu üyelerinin kişisel sorumluluğu

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    MAHAMMAD MAGHAMİNİA

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1996

    HukukAnkara Üniversitesi

    Özel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ZÜHTÜ AYTAÇ

  4. Lami`i Çelebi Şerefü`l-İnsan

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    SADETTİN EĞRİ

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1997

    Türk Dili ve EdebiyatıGazi Üniversitesi

    Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. CEMAL KURNAZ