Geri Dön

Serahsi, Gazzali, El-Baci ve Ebu'l-Hüseyin El-Basri'nin fıkıh usullerinde hadislerin kullanımı

Serahsi's, Gazzali's, El-Baci's ve Ebu'l-Hüseyin El-Basri's usage of hadis in Islamic law metdology

  1. Tez No: 211920
  2. Yazar: ŞUAYB YAZICI
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF.DR. ALİ TOKSARI
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Din, Religion
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2007
  8. Dil: Türkçe
  9. Üniversite: Erciyes Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Temel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Hadis Bilim Dalı
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

Our study is form from four part which are agreement, comment, disagreement and real evidence (The Book and Sünnet) and one starting point. There are 170 hadises in the first part, 48 hadises in the second,195 hadises in the third and 36 hadises in the last part. In this study, we found 450 hadises which are in four boks, The Book, Sünnet, Agreement and Comment. We determined 49 wrong hadises in it. Except Serahsi, other three islamic Creed Leader had used some hadis in their books. Serahsi had used different hadises from other books. All the four writers used some hadis for an avidence in different parts of book. Also Serahsi, Bacî and Gazâlî had used their islamic Creed?s point of view. Bacî is the first who used hadis in his book with 203,Serahsi is the second with 185 hadis, Gazzâlî is the third with 141 and Mutemed is the last with 83 hadises. When we investigate merfu and mevkuf hadis, the situation is little different. Bacî had used more mevkuf hadis than other writers. When I examine four parts of our work. There are a lot of avidence of hadis in the first part. These are real news and they are opinions of deed, person who explains hadis and person whose explaniation isn?t agreed, mürsel news, Prophet?s habits and ideas. In the second part, condition of agreement, rule of agreement, cause of agreement and scholars opinion?s about agreement. In the last part, we used disagreable evidence. These are in a row ?Sedd-i Zerai, istihsan, ? er?u Men Kablena, Sahabe?s Utterence and istishab.? In this study, when we examine four writer?s hadis?s straightness, we see that most of these hadis is in Kütüb-i Tis?a. This shows us that islamic Scholars had often used right hadis or sahabe?s popular ideas, utterence.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Serahsi`nin el-Usulü ve Gazzali`nin el-Müstasfa`sına göre Delatün-Nass

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    YASİN KILAR

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1998

    DinSakarya Üniversitesi

    Temel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. MEHMET ERKAL

  2. Hanefî usulcülerinden kadı ebû zeyd ed-debûsînin kıyas nazariyesi (takvimül-edille adlı eseri çerçevesinde)

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    TEMEL KACIR

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2007

    DinGazi Üniversitesi

    Temel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF.DR. FERHAT KOCA

  3. İbn Hazm'ın en-Nübez adlı eserinin tahlili

    Analysis of İbn Hazm's book: Al-Nubadh

    ŞEYHMUS AKSAK

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2015

    HukukDokuz Eylül Üniversitesi

    Temel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı

    YRD. DOÇ. DR. İSMAİL ACAR

  4. Beşinci ve altıncı yüzyıl Hanefi Usulcüleriyle karşılaştırmalı olarak Gazzalinin delil teorisinde şer'u men kablena ve sahabi kavli

    Shar-u man kablana and sahabi kavli in Gazali's theory of evidence by comparision with Hanafite methodologists in Islamic jurisprudence in fifth and sixth centuries

    SÜLEYMAN TAŞKIN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2009

    DinSelçuk Üniversitesi

    Temel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. AHMET YAMAN

  5. Sırrı Giridî'nin Nakdu'l-Kelam adlı eseri ve Kelâm ilmindeki yeri

    Sirri Giridi's work Naqdu'l-Kalam and its place in the science of Kalam

    FATMA SÜMEYYE AKSOY

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2021

    DinHarran Üniversitesi

    Temel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ MEHMET CÜNEYT GÖKÇE