Bilginin kaynağı ve toplumsal işlevi üzerine eleştirel bir yaklaşım
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 18387
- Danışmanlar: Belirtilmemiş.
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Felsefe, Philosophy
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Bilgi, Bilgi kaynakları, Sosyal değişme, Sosyal yapı, Sosyoloji, Information, Information sources, Social change, Social structure, Sociology
- Yıl: 1991
- Dil: Türkçe
- Üniversite: Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
s u i: k a r y The fact of knowledge is composed of subject in psych logy and imaginational object in sociel field. Knowledge which happens in psychological event is als a subject of ps^rchology. But it is clear that the psychlogy can not explain th< characteristic of human knowledge. Because, knowledge is to not; fy the simplest fona of any subject. Psychology only investigates the effects of the subjec to the human but it doesn't anything about the fitness interest of the knowledge on the subject. It is told that the realizm ant the being current of knowledge are out the psychology subject. >/e can say secondly, knowledge in the logical field. Sl ob ject image in the subject is a logical component, and it is a subject of the logic with this apperance. But in this stuation 1 logic can not solve the konwledge problem. She logic, with logical compenent, investigates the re lationships of the knowledge with e at eh other on the person. Lo gic investigates the convention of the thoughts with it. Otherxwise, it can not explain if the knowledge has cc vent ion with object or not. For that reasen the fact of the knowledge is aut of th logic subject. She third the fact of knowledge is interested in socio logic field. Object is always in front of the human as a thing. Shis thing is accepted either a real object or unconti onel idea. Shis are a is the subject of society science. But the characteristics of the knowledge can not be sol' ved with society science, if we don'.t give importance the subjec 1<Îin the knowledge. It causes a mistake like object in the kn o v;l ed ge. For that reason, the difference of the individual and society has been given up not to have any. It is clear that, we will arrive a genera.! and large information about the income of knowledge, and fonksion of know ledge with there tree elements in the knowledge ( subject, object and image) It must be investigated together that the sociologic, psychologic and logic conditions in a new creation of the human mind instead of singular exuLaination. Ill
Benzer Tezler
- İş kazaları ile stres, kaygı ve öfke kavramları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi: 9 Türk ve 2 İngiliz tekstil fabrikasında yapılan bir araştırma
The relations between work accidents and stress, anxiety and anger: A survey at 9 Turkish and 2 English textile factories
M. HÜLYA ÜNAL KARAGÜVEN
Doktora
Türkçe
1997
Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileriİstanbul Üniversitesiİşletme Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. AYŞE CAN BAYSAL
- Studien zur literadur und kultur auffassung Friedrich Nietzsche und ihre wiederspiegelung in der Deutschen literadur anhand von Thomas Manns“Doktor Faustus”
Friedrich Nietzsche'nin edebiyat ve kültür anlayışı ve Thomas Mann'ın“Doktor Faustus”adlı eserini örnek alarak bu anlayışın Alman edebiyatına olan etkisi
NİLGÜN TÜRKER (MANİSA)
