Geri Dön

Türk Hukuk usulünde teminat

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 16884
  2. Yazar: EROL KÜTÜKÇÜOĞLU
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF.DR. RAMAZAN ARSLAN
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Hukuk, Law
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Teminat, Türk hukuku, Guarantee, Turkish law
  7. Yıl: 1991
  8. Dil: Türkçe
  9. Üniversite: Ankara Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

T. a Yükseköğretim Kurulu DokümantesjK» MerkMl SUMKARY OF THESIS As a rai e everybody has right to litigate ör make some regaest frora coart in oar law, Demandsnts are not asked fo.r warranty as a rai e. Bat legislators set ap some exemptions from the rûle. it is sometimes necessary to war- rant for briftging a sait and some reqaest. Not only Turkish citizens who have not resided in Tarkey but also ali foreigners ought to warrant in case of litigation in Tarkish ^oarts. This varrant is ased to gaaranty the expen~ ditares and loss of defendant. in addition to bringing e sait, a person is reqaired to warrant in some cases. These ere caa- tîonary judgement, cautionary attachment, executive proceedin?1, appeal, retrial restitıtion and composition with creditory. it is possible that defendant might be demaped becaise of the sait ör the cases which were stated above. Defencîent is able to demand the c~>mpansation of his expenditıres and loss from the warrant when the sait ör prosecation is an.jast. ior that reason, he shDald apply to the c o ir t to brincr a sıit. Those which are ased as warranty have been ststed in the system of law. Goort determines the amoûnt of warrant. it mast be in the amoant of compansation of defendant's expenditares and loss. Litigation of foreigners and Tırkish citizens who have not resided in Tarkey ör perticipation to sait and deterıcina- tion of the side who will warrant in the cases of ceutionary attachment, execative proceeding, appeal, retriel, restitı- tion composition with creditors and the sıman t of v;errarît » were examined in this thesis. What kind of loss and expen- ditores and person who is able to demand this warrant are also examined. Additionâlly the sabjects which ere releated to restoration of wsrranty, identity of people who will be restored, timing'afti the methods of restoration ete. vere researched too,;,

Benzer Tezler

  1. Tez No

    81747

    İş yargısı

    Labor courts procedure

    FATMA BAŞTERZİ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1999

    HukukAnkara Üniversitesi

    Özel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. RAMAZAN ARSLAN

  2. Tez No

    100140

    İslam Hukukun`da ve Osmanlı Devleti`nde egemenlik anlayışı

    The Concept of sovereignty in Islamic Law and Ottoman Empire

    AYBARS PAMİR

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2001

    HukukAnkara Üniversitesi

    PROF.DR. GÜLNİHAL BOZKURT

  3. Tez No

    92811

    Türk Hukuk sisteminde memurların yargılanması usulü

    Trial procedure rules of officials in Turkish legal system

    ŞAHNAZ GEREK

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2000

    Kamu YönetimiGazi Üniversitesi

    Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ZEHRA ODYAKMAZ

  4. Tez No

    64020

    Medeni Usul Hukukunda keşif

    Viewing in the Turkish Procedural Law

    SUZAN BAYRAKTAROĞLU

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1997

    HukukDokuz Eylül Üniversitesi

    Özel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. HAKAN PEKCANITEZ

  5. Tez No

    81520

    Yargı muafiyeti ve istinabe

    Judical exemption and letter of request

    NECLA YILMAZ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1999

    HukukAnkara Üniversitesi

    Özel Hukuk (medeni Usul ve İcra İflas Hukuku) Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. RAMAZAN ARSLAN

Geri Dön