Askeri ve stratejik açıdan Büyük Taarruz
Military and stratecig aspects of the Great Offensive
- Tez No: 145462
- Danışmanlar: YRD. DOÇ. DR. AHMET MEHMETEFENDİOĞLU
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Türk İnkılap Tarihi, Tarih, History of Turkish Revolution, History
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Askeri stratejiler, Büyük Taarruz, Kurtuluş Savaşı, Savaş, Stratejik analiz, Stratejik önem, Military strategies, Great Attack, Independence War, War, Strategic analysis, Stratejic importance
- Yıl: 2004
- Dil: Türkçe
- Üniversite: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılap Tarihi Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılap Tarihi Ana Bilim Dalı
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
ABSTRACT After Sakarya victory the time began to run in favour of Turks. The internal and external political situation of Greece was worsening. During the winter of 1921-1922, political efforts did not bear any fruit. The occupation forces had no intention to abandon the country. To liberate the land there was no other option but to expel the enemy by use of force. The Turkish High Command decided to launch the attack in August 1922. The Turkish Army began to attack towards Greek Army occupied land which extends from Afyon to Izmir. The cavalry corps did great job which caused a surprise attack during passing narrow gaps between hills. Battle of The Generalissimo occured in 30th August of 1922. The Supreme Commander Mustafa Kemal Pasha had studied his lesson too much and as a result he gave his historical order to destroy the surrounded forces. In order to speed up operations he himself went to the area of battle. Although all enemy forces could not be destroyed due to some delay, destruction of enemy continued till 9th of September. As a result The Greek Forces were chased into the Mediteranien Sea. The Greeks were defeated and annihilated in such a manner that they could not recover themselves for a long time.This victory provided the complete release of Turkish land from occupation. Morever, it set an example for Turkish Soldier of today about his capacity to combat when necessary. In addition it corroborated the thought that:“Anatolia can not be conquered”. II
Benzer Tezler
- M. 1835-1839 (H. 1251-1255) tarihli Çanakkale şer`iye sicilinin değerlendirilmesi ve transkripsiyonu
Evaluation and transcription of Çanakkale şer`iye register 1835-1839 (1251-1255)
ALİ SÖNMEZ
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
1998
TarihÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart ÜniversitesiYakınçağ Tarihi Bilim Dalı
YRD. DOÇ. DR. AHMET ALTINTAŞ
- Halep'teki Osmanlı Dönemi dini eserleri
Ottoman Period religious monuments in Aleppo
KEMAL HAKAN TEKİN
Doktora
Türkçe
2008
Sanat TarihiErciyes Üniversitesiİslam Tarihi ve Sanatları Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. KERİM TÜRKMEN
- Rusya Federasyonu'nun Transkafkasya'ya yönelik dış politikasının Türkiye'ye etkileri
The effects of Russian Federation's foreign policy regarding Transcaucasus to Turkey
AHMET SAPMAZ
- Le role des relations entre les alaouites et les sunnites dans le cadre de la legitimation du regime d'Hafez el-Assad en Syrie
Suriye'deki alevi sunni ilişkilerinin Hafız Esad iktidarını meşrulaştırmasındaki rolü = The role of the relations between alawites and sunnis in the legitimation of the Hafez Asad regime in Syria
BAHAR BAKIR
Yüksek Lisans
Fransızca
2006
Uluslararası İlişkilerGalatasaray ÜniversitesiUluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı
Y.DOÇ. ALİ FAİK DEMİR
- Stratejik yönetim, stratejik planlama ve Orduda uygulanabilirliği
Stratejik management, stratejik planning and usage in the army
ÖMER ERDOĞAN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2004
Kamu YönetimiAbant İzzet Baysal ÜniversitesiKamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. HALİL İ. ÜLKER