A Conversation analytical account of responding in a second language
İkinci dilde cevap verme stratejilerinin söylem çözümlemesi açısından açıklanması
- Tez No: 127964
- Danışmanlar: YRD. DOÇ. DR. İSMET ÖZTÜRK
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: İngiliz Dili ve Edebiyatı, English Language and Literature
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Cevaplama davranışı, Edimbilim, Konuşma, Konuşma davranışları, Yabancı dil öğretimi, İkinci dil, İkram, İngilizce, pragmatics, speech acts, preference organization, responding to offers, responding to assessments, preferred responses, dispreferred responses. in, Answering behavior, Speech, Conversational behaviours, Foreign language teaching, Second language, Honouring, English
- Yıl: 2003
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: Uludağ Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Yabancı Diller Eğitimi Ana Bilim Dalı
- Bilim Dalı: İngiliz Dili Eğitimi Bilim Dalı
- Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
ABSTRACT The present cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate the responding strategies of the Turkish EFL learners in responding to offers and assessments in a conversation analytical perspective with respect to their proficiency and, the ability of using their receptive and productive pragmatic knowledge. The subjects were 28 university students. An intermediate level homogenous group of the subjects were chosen for the study and to determine the level of proficiency a cloze test was administered to the subjects. Data were collected by the use of two discourse completion tasks (The Production Tests) and a multiple choice questionnaire (The Perception Tests) in English seperately designed for both offers and assessments. By the use of these tests, the subjects' differentiation between the realisation of the preferred and dispreferred responses in responding to offers and assessments according to preference organization system in English and the difference between the subjects' ability of using their productive and receptive pragmatic knowledge in their responding strategies when responding to offers and assessments were explored. The present study aims to find out whether there is a relationship between the learners' language proficiency and pragmatic knowledge in responding to offers and assessments. The results indicate that there is not a significant relationship between the learners' language proficiency and pragmatic knowledge in responding to offers and assessments. With respect to the learners' differentiation between the preferred and dispreferred responses, the results reveal that Turkish EFL learners do not appear to differentiate between the realisation of the preferred and dispreferred responses in responding to offers neither in the production nor in the perception test. The learners do not seem to have a native-like pragmatic comptetence in responding to offers in the preferred and dispreferred format neither in the production nor in the perception test. On the other hand, the learners seem to differentiate between the realisation of the preferred and dispreferred responses in responding to assessments both in the production and perception test. The learners seem to achieve more successful pragmatic competence in responding to assessments in the preferred format rather than the dispreferred format. However, the learners' overuse of one or two types of prefabricated forms which are not frequently occur among the native speakers of English and not suitable for all social or cultural conditions do not reflect a native-like pragmatic competence in responding to assessment in the preferred format. Also, no significant difference was observed between the learners' ability of using their productive and receptive pragmatic knowledge in their use or selection of the responding strategies in responding to offers in the dispreferred format, and in responding to assessments both in the preferred and dispreferred format. However, there is a significant difference between the learners' ability to use their productive and receptive pragmatic knowledge in responding to offers in the preferred format. The results suggest that the learners' ability of using their receptive pragmatic knowledge seems to be better than the ability of using their productive pragmatic knowledge in responding to offers in the preferred format. Possible reasons for these results are the“text-book effect”,“overgeneralisation”, and“pragmatic transfer caused by the Turkish language and culture”.
Benzer Tezler
- Çok ölçütlü sorun çözümüne yönelik bir bütünleşik karar destek modeli
Integrated decision aid model for multiattribute problem solving
YUSUF İLKER TOPÇU
Doktora
Türkçe
2000
Endüstri ve Endüstri Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiPROF. DR. FÜSUN ÜLENGİN
- Sıkıştırılmış sıvı kaynaması
Subcooled boiling
ZEHİR FATİH ÖZTÜRK
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
1997
Nükleer Mühendislikİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiFizik Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. ŞARMAN GENÇAY
- Sigortacılık sisteminde aktif-pasif yönetimi ve Türkiye hayat sigortası örneğinde portföy performansının boyutlarını belirleyen faktörlerin irdelenmesine ilişkin bir model denemesi
Assets and liablity management in the insurance sector and investigating sectors that are determinating dimensions of the portfolio performance by relating to model testing in the Turkish life insurance sector
ALİ İHSAN DOĞAN
- Kömür yakılan kazanda ve sobada ağır metal emisyonlarının incelenmesi
Başlık çevirisi yok
EMEL SAÇAKLI
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
1998
Kimya Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiKimya Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. HASANCAN OKUTAN